----------------------- REVIEW 1 ---------------------
No comments given
----------------------- REVIEW 2 ---------------------
1) What do the author mean by "one-of-a-kind prediction method" (in Abstract)?
ANS -- Changed the term and gave clarity
2) In the Literature review section, there is an uncommon way to present a related approach.
ANS -- 1st paragraph correction done.
3) Regarding the methodology, there are some points that should be clarified:
ANS - Yes emotions are classified after work.
4) The experimental part should be improved, both in presenting and analysing the obtained results.
ANS-- Yes other statistical measures were added (TP,TN,FP,FN)
5) The last sentence from Section VII - there is a typo "Generative (adversarial networks)", not "Generalized (adversarial networks)".
ANS - Proof reading suggestion & English correction done.
----------------------- REVIEW 3 ---------------------
The article is nicely written, and the work is worth being published. But it has to be rewritten, as at this point it is very negligently set up.
ANS -- We have rewritten all possible point to increase the standards
We taken care SECTIONS, FIGURES, TABLES, NUMBERS as per the reviewer comments.